Brought to you by Colorado DUI Drunk Driving Defense

Waterbury DUI Lawyers

1. Broder, Gary: misdemeanors, felonies or motor vehicle offenses
2. Attanasio, Jerry: CRIMINAL LAW is the prosecution by the government of a person who has been accused of an act that under the penal code is classified as a crime. Crimes can be classified as felonies which are serious offenses, or misdemeanors such as petty theft. DUI/DWI: Those charged with Driving Under the Influence or Driving While Intoxicated (DUI/DWI) are prosecuted both criminally and administratively. The accused must face a judge in criminal court along with a hearing officer from the Department of Motor Vehicles. This administrative per se hearing determines the suspension of the driverŐs license. Being charged with a DUI/DWI can be a frightening experience. You need an attorney who knows and understands Connecticut DUI/DWI law to help you defend the criminal charges, obtain a work permit, and deal with the suspension of the license.
3. Santarsiero, Christopher G.: Criminal Law DUI/DWI Motor Vehicle Accidents -- Plaintiff Personal Injury -- Plaintiff Traffic Violations Wills Workers' Compensation Law
4. Cicchetti, Tansley & McGrath: Prosecutorial misconduct is where the prosecutor has engaged in some type of improper behavior before or during a case. For the prosecutor to be guilty of misconduct she must have knowingly engaged in an improper act. If the prosecutor used evidence that she believed was authentic and real although it was not, she would not be guilty of prosecutorial misconduct. There are numerous instances that constitute misconduct.
5. Garver, Scott: If you are accused of a crime or being investigated of a crime the first person you need to talk to is an experienced CT Criminal Defense Attorney. Whether you are guilty or innocent it is important that you know and exercise your legal rights when speaking to police investigators. Too often people unintentionally incriminate themselves when they do no need to. Call an experienced defense attorney before you agree to speak to the police or any other investigators.
6. Michael Gannon: Pursuant to FRE 609, evidence of a witness's prior felony convictions may be admissible to impeach the credibility of the witness, as long as the probative value of the evidence is not substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice. Similarly, evidence of a defendant's prior felony convictions may be admissible to impeach the credibility of the defendant, if the court determines that the probative value of the evidence outweighs its prejudicial effect to the accused. This is a less restrictive measure than the one required for witnesses, which means that it is easier to impeach a defendant with evidence of a prior felony conviction than it is to impeach another witness. Further, evidence that any witness (including the defendant) has been convicted of any crime of dishonesty is admissible for impeachment purposes. However, a prior conviction that is more than 10 years old will usually be inadmissible, unless the court determines that the probative value of the conviction substantially outweighs its prejudicial effect. In this case, the proponent of the evidence must give the other party "sufficient advance written notice of intent to use such evidence."