Greenbelt DUI Lawyers
- Lawlor & Englert:
Trial
Charges are usually brought in the district court initially. The case will either be tried in district court or, if the defendant is indicted, the case will be tried in the circuit court.
Sentencing
Following sentencing in most cases, a defendant has the right, within 30 days of sentencing, to file an application for review of sentence by a three judge panel. Additionally, within 90 days of sentencing, a defendant has the right to file a motion for modification of sentence, requesting that the sentencing judge reconsider the sentence.
Direct Appeal
Following trial, a defendant may appeal his or her conviction to the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. Issues raised on direct appeal are typically trial or sentencing errors that were objected to by trial counsel. A defendant who pleads guilty has more limited rights of appeal that are generally restricted to attacking the voluntariness of the guilty plea.
If the Court of Special Appeals affirms the convictions and sentences, a defendant may petition the Court of Appeals of Maryland for permission to appeal the case to that court. Whether or not the Court of Appeals chooses to hear the case is entirely within the courtÕs discretion.
Post-Conviction Proceedings
After the direct appeal has been exhausted, a defendant may bring a petition for post-conviction relief in the circuit court. This is the forum to raise issues that are not always evident in the record, such as ineffective assistance of trial and/or appellate counsel. Petitioners who were sentenced after October 1, 1995, have ten years from the date of sentencing to file a petition for post-conviction relief.
If the petition for post-conviction relief is denied, a petitioner may file an application for leave to appeal, seeking permission to appeal the circuit courtÕs decision. If granted, the petitioner may then appeal the circuit courtÕs denial of the post-conviction petition to the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. The denial of an application for leave to appeal cannot be appealed to the Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Federal Habeas Corpus Proceedings
Once all state remedies have been exhausted, a petitioner may file a petition for writ of habeas corpus in federal district court alleging violations of federal constitutional rights. Federal habeas petitions are subject to a narrow statute of limitations period and higher standards of proof.
If the federal district court denies the petition, a petitioner may appeal to the appropriate United States Court of Appeals only if he or she is granted a certificate of appealability. An application for certificate of appealability is filed first in the appropriate United States district court and, if denied, in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit.
- Houlon Berman:
If you are taken into police custody, you have the right to be informed of the charges against you and the maximum penalties; to remain silent; to be represented by counsel, including the right to have one appointed if you cannot afford one; and have a judge decide whether you should be released from jail until your trial.
- Nakia Gray:
If you are charged with a crime, you are entitled to competent legal representation. It is your constitutional right to be represented by an attorney.
- Richard Arnold:
In Maryland, if you are stopped and charged with driving under the
influence/ driving while intoxicated (DUI / DWI), you have 10 days to
file a request for administrative hearing, or else your license will
automatically be suspended in 45 days. In the meanwhile, you will be
driving under a temporary license; the DR-15 form that you will be
presented with at the time of the stop contains other critical
information that you should be aware of. There are many things that you
can do to aid your defense in the short time you have available, so it
is very important to contact a Maryland DUI / DWI defense attorney
immediately if you are issued such a citation.
- Leonard Stamm:
The first thing that someone arrested for drunk driving in Maryland
needs to do (other than immediately schedule a consultation with a
lawyer) is to request a hearing with the Office of Administrative
Hearings.
- Robert
Bonsib:
CROSSING CENTER LANE JUSTIFIES TRAFFIC
STOP
Dowdy v.
State, 144 Md.App. 325, 798 A.2d 1
(2002). A trooper noticed DowdyÕs
vehicle continuously slowly drift from side to side in lane two of the
highway and observed that the car was not being driven in a straight
line. On two occasions the vehicleÕs tires crossed the lane
markings into lane one. The second cross-over occurred 1Ú2 mile
after the first and during that time one fourth of the vehicle crossed
over the line. The trooper testified he stopped the vehicle
because he believed the operator was intoxicated. Dowdy failed
sobriety tests and was arrested for DWI. A search incident to the
arrest resulted in the recovery of controlled substances.
&
nbsp; The CSA held that a traffic stop for violation of 21-309 was
justified under the facts of this case and distinguished this case from
Rowe finding that the conduct of Dowdy created the type of
potential danger to other drivers that the COA found absent in
Rowe.
Return to Maryland DUI Lawyers
|