Brought to you by Colorado DUI Drunk Driving Defense

McKinney DWI Lawyers

  1. Hardin, House, Hultkrantz and Associates:

    In the State of Texas, a person is considered intoxicated if he or she has an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more. If one is caught driving while intoxicated, a DWI conviction could result in a criminal record and jail time, the suspension or loss of your driver’s license and in some cases, the installation of an ignition interlock device on your car.

    However, this need not be the case.

    A DWI case includes not only the criminal charge but also a civil administrative license revocation (ALR) hearing. An ALR suspension is initiated against a driver, when following the arrest, he or she refuses to submit to a breath test or blood test, or fails either a breath test or blood test. The legal basis for the suspension is Texas’ implied consent law, which states that a person who drives on Texas roads implicitly consents to take a breath test or blood test to determine whether the person is driving while intoxicated.

    Should you refuse the test or your test indicates an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more, you are still entitled to a hearing to contest the suspension of your driver’s license. A notice for a hearing must be submitted in writing within 15 days of receiving the notice of suspension, usually the date of your arrest. At the hearing, you can challenge:

    1. The circumstances of your arrest – did the police officer have reasonable suspicion to stop you and did the police officer have probable cause to arrest you
    2. Your refusal to take the test
    3. The result of the test if you took the test and failed
  2. Daniel, Duecker & Harrison: Officers employvarious methods of analysis to determine sobriety,including requiringsuspects to walk a straight line, touchtheir nose, recitetheir home address and submit to blood, urine or breath analyses. However, the debate continues as to whether police officers should be permitted to determine a suspect's intoxication. Proponents of officer testing argue that due to the epidemic nature of alcohol-related highway dangers, officer testing is necessary and sufficiently reliable.
Return to Texas DWI Lawyers